<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposed Enhancements For Web Browsers</title>
	<link>http://www.semergence.com/2008/06/10/proposed-enhancements-for-web-browsers/</link>
	<description>Semantic Web, Ruby on Rails, and Massive Data</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: drewp</title>
		<link>http://www.semergence.com/2008/06/10/proposed-enhancements-for-web-browsers/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>drewp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.semergence.com/2008/06/10/proposed-enhancements-for-web-browsers/#comment-689</guid>
		<description>A more browser-centered solution that doesn't involve changing HTML (!) would be to make a way to temporarily jump back to a designated tab or tabs. I could use that kind of solution on any existing website, not just ones who use your extension. And, the same system would work if there's a little bit more than some commands that I want to easily jump to, e.g. a chat window.

Example implementation: when I'm hovering on a tab and I press ctrl-0, add a [0] to the tab label. I can make 10 such markers with ctrl-0..9. When I press ctrl-0 later, render that [0] tab's page on top of my current page, inset from the edges a little. At the top of the inset render, write "Showing [title of tab], ctrl-0 to close". That will reinforce the idea that this is meant for temporary usage, and that the page I was previously viewing is just underneath the [0] page. I.e. there's a visible stack of two pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A more browser-centered solution that doesn&#8217;t involve changing HTML (!) would be to make a way to temporarily jump back to a designated tab or tabs. I could use that kind of solution on any existing website, not just ones who use your extension. And, the same system would work if there&#8217;s a little bit more than some commands that I want to easily jump to, e.g. a chat window.</p>
<p>Example implementation: when I&#8217;m hovering on a tab and I press ctrl-0, add a [0] to the tab label. I can make 10 such markers with ctrl-0..9. When I press ctrl-0 later, render that [0] tab&#8217;s page on top of my current page, inset from the edges a little. At the top of the inset render, write &#8220;Showing [title of tab], ctrl-0 to close&#8221;. That will reinforce the idea that this is meant for temporary usage, and that the page I was previously viewing is just underneath the [0] page. I.e. there&#8217;s a visible stack of two pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hume</title>
		<link>http://www.semergence.com/2008/06/10/proposed-enhancements-for-web-browsers/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.semergence.com/2008/06/10/proposed-enhancements-for-web-browsers/#comment-687</guid>
		<description>The same context menu could come up when right-clicking a window button on a task bar, for GUIs that have such things. (I can't think of a place where that would appear in OS X.)

I'd also still like to see browsers incorporate buttons for LINK tags specifying next page, previous page, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same context menu could come up when right-clicking a window button on a task bar, for GUIs that have such things. (I can&#8217;t think of a place where that would appear in OS X.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also still like to see browsers incorporate buttons for LINK tags specifying next page, previous page, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.semergence.com/2008/06/10/proposed-enhancements-for-web-browsers/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.semergence.com/2008/06/10/proposed-enhancements-for-web-browsers/#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Isn't IE8 doing something with context menu's? I don't think they are tackling this exact situation, but I know it was something like that.

IE, doing something right? It can't be true!!! &#62;;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t IE8 doing something with context menu&#8217;s? I don&#8217;t think they are tackling this exact situation, but I know it was something like that.</p>
<p>IE, doing something right? It can&#8217;t be true!!! &gt;;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colm Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.semergence.com/2008/06/10/proposed-enhancements-for-web-browsers/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Colm Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.semergence.com/2008/06/10/proposed-enhancements-for-web-browsers/#comment-682</guid>
		<description>lot to be said for just sticking to just? documents [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lot to be said for just sticking to just? documents [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
